ecological movement

We watched the film „Beyond the Red Lines“ relatively early on and then had a discussion about it. The film follows three protest initiatives before and during the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris. „Beyond the Red Lines“ tells the story of a growing movement that says „Enough is enough! Ende Gelände!“ (No more compromises) and engages in civil disobedience, taking the transformation towards a climate-just society into their own hands (https://www.ende-gelaende.org/en/). Some participants were already familiar with such actions, while for others, it was their first time seeing such images. It quickly became evident that different forms of environmental activism are prevalent in different countries, and in Germany, a special tradition of protest has emerged through the anti-nuclear movement. In other countries, there were much more pronounced protests for social or political reasons.
After the film, we gathered in small groups and discussed the questions raised by the film. It was alarming to see that since the film was made in 2015, essentially nothing has changed. The socio-ecological movements still exist and have achieved little, leading to the radicalization of individual protest movements (e.g., „Last Generation,“ „Extinction Rebellion“). Yet, humanity continues to march steadily towards its own demise, ignoring the obvious consequences of its destructive actions and caring more about today’s exploitative luxuries than the consequences of its behavior.
The alarming aspect is that we all know it theoretically, but we don’t truly care about it in practice. We are shaped by growing up in societies that are skeptical of changes, especially if they involve limiting consumption. Progress is often associated with growth, and prosperity with consumption.
We discussed our personal responsibility in this whole situation extensively. Suddenly, it was no longer just about whether we can behave more sustainably through our personal consumption. Keywords: vegan, eco, greenwashing. We won’t be able to turn the tide through „more sustainable consumption.“ For our generation, it’s more about what levers we can set in motion to bring about bigger changes. For us, the future is genuinely at stake.
Later in the youth encounter, we had another input on this topic. The author of the book “Kleine Geschichte der Umweltbewegung” („Little story about the ecological movement“) was a guest one evening and gave a lecture followed by discussions in small groups. We learned a lot about existing networks of global environmental activists and subsequently developed initial ideas for our own engagement.

„I am inspired and empowered to take action against climate change and fight for a better future. There are various ways I can contribute to this crucial cause. Firstly, I can reduce my own carbon footprint by adopting sustainable lifestyle choices such as minimizing waste, conserving energy, and opting for eco-friendly alternatives. Secondly, I can engage in activism by joining climate strikes, raising awareness through social media, and participating in local environmental initiatives. Additionally, I can advocate for policy changes by contacting elected representatives, supporting climate-friendly policies, and encouraging others to do the same. By taking individual and collective action, we can make a significant impact in mitigating climate change and preserving our planet for future generations.“

global footprint test

„Taking the global footprint test for the first time was a humbling experience. Despite my belief that I led a sustainable lifestyle, the results sensibilized me to the stark reality of resource consumption. It hit me how much I unintentionally contribute to depleting resources, considering the limited availability for everyone worldwide. It’s made me reevaluate my choices and take a more mindful approach to minimize my ecological impact. I now understand the urgent need for change and strive to make a difference by embracing sustainable practices and advocating for a more equitable distribution of resources.“

Workshop 29.5. solar and wind energy

„I am amazed by the successful repair of the solar thermal system that the owners of the place installed some years ago. We got help for this by a solar technician who explained us also how the system works. Now it provides an abundant supply of hot water for everyone’s evening showers, all thanks to the power of the sun. This experience leaves me pondering why such simple and sustainable systems are not more widely adopted. The efficiency and effectiveness of harnessing solar energy for heating water is evident, and it makes me question why we rely so heavily on conventional energy sources.“

civilization without electricity - is it conceivable?

We embarked on an evening of thought experiment: What if there were no electricity? How would our society look then?
We initially divided into small groups and engaged in lively discussions. It became immediately evident to all of us how incredibly dependent we have become on electricity – nothing works without it, and yet it has only been around for about 150 years, with widespread electrification existing for about 100 years. We all agreed that if electricity were to suddenly disappear overnight, it would lead to significant social tensions, even wars. Therefore, we focused on a thought experiment that deliberately ignores today’s reality. We were interested in imagining how a society would function if we had today’s knowledge but electricity simply didn’t exist. What would be different? Initially, we actually had enormous difficulties envisioning such a scenario without painting a picture reminiscent of the Middle Ages or the 18th century. Our society is so fixated on global communication, and our knowledge is so heavily digitized that it seems impossible to conceive of a modern society without electricity.
It was only when we shifted our focus to the interpersonal level that the breakthrough came: Our civilization is not only about science and progress (which, honestly, is also part of the problem with climate change) but also about our form of social coexistence.
We started painting a utopia where all human basic needs are met, where everyone treats each other with respect, and where everyone can freely flourish. And we realized that it doesn’t require electricity for this to happen, but rather a societal consensus that the group can only thrive if each individual thrives.
However, when it came to practical implementation possibilities, we were at a loss. Whether with or without electricity, the group of 8 billion people seemed too large to achieve such a societal consensus. It is clear, though, that without electricity, it would be much more challenging than with electricity.